The Independent Ear

Swing & The Blues: still essential skills & wisdom for successful jazz musicians?

In what we anticipate will be a series of commentaries from young jazz musicians (in this case we’re talking 20 and 30something artists).  Our first respondent is the very thoughtful and grounded pianist Aaron Goldberg. Born & raised in Boston, Goldberg’s advanced music studies began at age 17 at the New School for Jazz and Contemporary Music.  After enrolling at Harvard, where he graduated in ’96, Aaron won the IAJE Clifford Brown/Stan Getz Fellowship award.

Speaking of swing & the blues, Goldberg certainly got a full dose of that grounding as part of Betty Carter‘s acclaimed incubator program Jazz Ahead.  Since then Goldberg has been sideman to Joshua Redman, Kurt Rosenwinkel, Madeleine Peyroux, Guillermo Klein, Terry Gibbs/Buddy DeFranco, and a host of others.  His current — and fourth — recording as a leader is “Home,” with Reuben Rogers on bass and Eric Harland on drums.

The basic premise of this anticipated series of inquiries was a recent interview in one of the jazz prints where an artist talked about how, to their ultimate detriment it seems a growing number of jazz musicians trained in the conservatories or university programs seem so focused on writing complex, original material that they wind up writing and playing with what seems to be the sole intent of impressing their peers, rather than playing for audiences.

In his recent DownBeat magazine profile Aaron Goldberg went in the opposite direction and spoke to the continuing need for developing and emerging artists to be somehow versed in swing and the blues (perhaps before launching off into their original writing?).  So I reached out and asked Aaron to expound on that thought for The Independent Ear.

Aaron Goldberg: I think there are three separate issues that your question raises, and they’re worth treating separately.

1) Whether conservatories and university programs are contributing to the fact that some of the original music produced by jazz musicians today is inaccessible to a wide general audience.  My own opinion is that music schools ought to be neither blamed nor credited for the artistic decisions of their graduates, whether poor or admirable.  The reason is that both the most and least brilliant of my peers all spent at least a significant period in some kind of conservatory or university jazz program.

What separates the brightest among us from the rest is that they realized early on that one does not and cannot learn to play jazz in a classroom.  Rather one learns to be a great jazz musician the same way that Charlie Parker and Louis Armstrong and John Coltrane and Miles Davis learned: by copying the greats that came before, especially those one finds most personally inspiring.  Any innovations that stand the test of time necessarily emerge out of this classic process of immersion imitation and assimilation, including spending as much time on the bandstand as possible discovering and developing one’s own voice.

The relative paucity of great bands today compared to yesterday is not the fault of music schools, but rather a complicated combination of cultural and economic shifts, marketing-related problems and record industry related problems, for which various culprits include: the rise and primacy of the music video – which decreases aural attention spans and privileges ‘eye candy’ and sensationalism over musical storytelling — the fact that fewer venues are able to support multi-night engagements, a flood of independent and self-produced CDs and concerts with little quality control, poor or no music education in public schools leading to a smaller potential audience, hyper-capitalized corporate marketing of sex and money in music in general, and various other social and economic factors in and around the jazz world.  But music schools themselves are probably not to blame, for no one really learns how to play in a school setting anyway.

2) The relation between Complexity and Quality. Great jazz musicians have been composing and playing complex original material for a long time.  Music is a form of human communication.  A great jazz musician takes his or her audience on a narrative journey that leaves the listener psychologically (or ‘spiritually’) altered, and hopefully grateful for the experience.  This transformation provides the social motive for improvisation as an art form.  Of course complexity (of tunes or solos) for its own sake has never been a recipe for quality, but neither has complexity precluded quality.

There is plenty of bad music, along with plenty of good music, of all degrees of complexity.  The music of Bird and Trane is obviously extremely complex yet beautiful.  No jazz lover (least of all me) could ever suggest that the universe would have been better off had such masters opted to simplify their work.  A living master like Abdullah Ibrahim writes relatively simple songs that are perfect and beautiful just as they are.  Other living masters like Kurt Rosenwinkel or Guillermo Klein write intricate songs that are also perfect and beautiful just as they are.  The same principle applies to improvised solos.  A Hank Mobley or Peter Bernstein solo may be relatively simpler in terms of the number of notes it contains than a Lenny Tristano or Mark Turner solo.  But all four musicians are/were great jazz musicians.

There is an ever-shifting balance between simplicity and complexity that all great artists have to negotiate in their own work, but by no means is this dialectic fixed in such a way that complexity somehow precludes beauty.

One problem I do see is that young musicians sometimes seem to forget that what makes jazz high art is first and foremost the quality of the improvisation. Great jazz musicians always have been by and large improvisers first and composers second, with very few arguable exceptions (e.g. Monk/Ellington/Shorter).  One error student musicians tend to make today is that even as beginning or middling improvisers, they often spend a lot of time already trying to write original material.  Many seem to think they ought to (or have to) record a CD of original music by age 18 or 21 and build a website and Facebook page to promote it.  This is an artistic mistake.  No one wants to attend a gig if the improvisations that follow the melodies are mediocre, no matter how ingenious the tunes (and of course it’s also hard to write great tunes).  This brings me to he third and related point.

Aaron and his trio mates, left: drummer Eric Harland, middle: bassist Reuben Rogers

3) How to become a good jazz improviser. It is extremely difficult (not necessarily impossible, just very difficult and therefore very rare) to become a great improvising jazz musician  without spending a large amount of time learning how to swing and phrase melodically over standard song forms and chord changes, including the blues.  This is mainly an empirical point.  Every fine jazz musician I know of, of ANY age, style and instrument, from Wayne Shorter to Miguel Zenon to Lee Konitz to Ornette Coleman to Jan Garbarek, from Brad Mehldau to Jason Moran to Jacky Terrason to Colin Vallon, has a deep respect for this aspect of the jazz tradition.  No matter what they choose to perform on a given night or stage in their career, all spent time learning to play song forms and blues, and other vehicles for melodic improvisation, and all display a deep love of the rhythmic aspects of swing as well.

Why is this? It is because these skills are vital to one’s fluency and efficacy as a jazz improviser, in any setting.  Even if one chooses to focus wholly on performing original music or free music or ethnic musics from around the world, studying the jazz language gives you the vocabulary and grammar to speak eloquently in a variety of genres.

This fact reflects a simpler and more general empirical fact about human achievement in any realm: one must study the masters in order to achieve mastery.  To be a great composer one must study other great composers.  No great composer has ever lived who did not do so.  This is why [in the DB article] I said something like “if you think you can be a great musician without learning to swing and play standards, just prove it to me.”  It’s probably not impossible to accomplish, given the many surprising capacities of the human brain.  It’s just very improbable.

Look around at other realms of art and human accomplishment and you won’t be surprised.  Great writers read other great writers.  Great actors study other great actors. Great painters study other great painters.  Great architects study other great architects. Great presidents study other great presidents.  Simply put, it seems to be a necessary process in any field.  Given that the greatest jazz musicians all excel at phrasing melodically over song forms and blues, among their many personal qualities, it seems intuitive that one would need to study their example in order to advance as a jazz musician.  This does NOT mean, however, that all great jazz musicians must perform or record classic material or make it central to their artistic identity.  But it does imply that a budding jazz student ought to study the finest examples of this material — and practice it with other musicians, given the social nature of the art — in order to progress towards greatness.

Aaron Goldberg: www.aarongoldberg.com


Posted in Artist's P.O.V. | 4 Comments

A Triumphant Uhuru Afrika

This year marks the 50th anniversary of NEA Jazz Master Randy Weston‘s opus “Uhuru Afrika.” Originally recorded for the Roulette label in ’59 and subsequently reissued several times as part of the Blue Note family, including most recently as part of Mosaic Records’ Select series, “Uhuru Afrika” is a 4-part suite for 22-piece orchestra (conducted by Paul West), two vocalists and a narrator.  Weston wrote “Uhuru Afrika” in 1959 to celebrate the freedom from colonization of 17 African nations; Uhuru Afrika is Swahili for Freedom Africa.  The great poet and Weston friend Langston Hughes wrote the introductory poem — which was recited for the record date by a UN diplomat in English and Swahili — and NEA Jazz Master Melba Liston wrote the detailed arrangements for a jazz orchestra that included two bassists and a 6-piece percussion section that ranged from African percussion (played by Babatunde Olatunji) to drums from across the diaspora, including NEA Jazz Master Max Roach on marimba.

On Saturday, November 13 at Tribeca Performing Arts Center (at the Borough of Manhattan Community College), Weston triumphantly re-created “Uhuru Afrika” with an ensemble including two masters from the original recording session, trap drummer Charlie Persip and NEA Jazz Master hand drummer Candido, who at 91 nearly stole the show.  Preceding a beautiful reading of Langston Hughes freedom poem, the prelude was provided by the ancient African instruments the balaphone and the kora.

Here’s a photo gallery of that historic evening from the learned eye of photographer Lawrence C. Shelley.

Randy Weston introducing the first movement of “Uhuru Afrika.”

Narrator and banjo player Ayodele Ankhtawi Maakheru reciting Langston Hughes’ freedom poem invocation.  There is no banjo part in the original score but Ayodele was so inspired that during the closing movement “Kucheza Blues” he grabbed his banjo — another ancient African instrument — and stoked the fire.

Kinetic energy source bassist Alex Blake.

Candido nearly stole the show with his hard hands.  The audience exploded in delight after the 91-year old’s first solo.

Randy with vocalist Jann Parker, whose reading of Langston Hughes’ lyric “African Lady” was sublime.

African Rhythms Quintet regulars TK Blue and Billy Harper blowing Weston’s “African Sunrise.”

French Hornist Vincent Chancey and trumpeters Eddie Henderson and James Zollar blowing the grand finale “Kucheza Blues.”

Special thanks to photographer Lawrence C. Shelley for the images


African Rhythms: the autobiography of Randy Weston (Composed by Randy Weston, Arranged by Willard Jenkins; Duke University Press) is available now at your favorite book emporium or online at Amazon.com and other reliable services.





Posted in General Discussion | 1 Comment

Ain’t But a Few of Us: Author Karen Chilton

Several weeks ago at a Brooklyn book signing at the MoCADA gallery for native son Randy Weston and our new book African Rhythms (Composed by Randy Weston, Arranged by Willard Jenkins published by Duke University Press; see elsewhere in The Independent Ear) I had the pleasure of meeting author and thespian Karen Chilton.  Most recently she authored the Hazel Scott bio and prior to that co-authored Gloria Lynne’s memoirs with Ms. Lynne.  As we swapped stories about our book odysseys there was remarkable simpatico not only with our respective paths but also with Karen and the other contributors to our ongoing series of conversations with black music writers.  Her participation in this series was a no-brainer.

What’s been your experience writing about jazz and music in general?

Karen Chilton: Extraordinary.  I never set out to write books, much less books about jazz.  When I moved to New York City from my hometown Chicago eighteen years ago, my only intention was to be an actor, to perform in the theater and write for the stage.  My interests were purely in the dramatic arts — theater and film.  The only works I ever hoped to publish were my stage plays.  And while I’ve had the great fortune of doing all I’ve set out to do, my journey has been anything but predictable.  It’s been one surprising turn after the other.  I believe the first twist in the path came when I decided after studying classical piano from ages 5 to 17 at the Chicago Conservatory of Music to cast it all aside, and study Economics and Finance in college.  I still have no reasonable explanation for THAT decision, but I found solace in playwright Edward Albee’s famous quote: “Sometimes it’s necessary to go a long distance out of the way in order to come back a short distance correctly.”

For years I worked as a freelance writer to support my acting habit.  [Editor’s note: now there’s a twist on the usual writer’s path!]  Because I always loved music, especially jazz, I opted to do music reviews and features on musicians.  Eventually, I met a woman who chased me down in Barnes & Noble asking if I knew any women who wrote books about jazz.  I promptly told her I didn’t and pointed her in the direction of the Information Desk.  I think I even made some snide remark like: “Jazz books are written entirely by men, and most of them aren’t even American.”  She turned out to be Gloria Lynne’s publicist.  She gave me her card and asked me to call her if I knew anyone that might be interested in co-authoring Ms. Lynne’s memoir.

At the time I was working a temp job at a major record label that I believed was sure to send me straight to an asylum, so the very next day I called and suggested myself for the job.  I had about five years’ worth of feature articles on all kinds of musicians, from Youssou N’Dour to Jon Lucien to Seal to show as writing samples.  I was initially turned down by the literary agent having had no track record as an author, but six months later, I was called back and offered the gig.  Gloria Lynne chose me.  She liked my writing style and she wanted to tell her story to another Black woman.  That’s how it all began.

It was a baptism of fire.  The writing came easy.  It’s all storytelling to me.  Being an actor and writer are extensions of the same gift, the gift of telling a story well whether it’s on the page or on the stage.  And Gloria Lynne has a fascinating life story which made my creative work a pleasure trip.  The countless hours we spent together talking over her kitchen table were more fun than any two people ought to be allowed to have, but dealing with the rigors of actually getting the book published — the publisher, the agents, the editors, the production team, the publicists — it was quite overwhelming.  Gratification came later.  Much later…

Karen Chilton’s successful collaboration with the distinctively soulful song stylist Gloria Lynne.

Do you feel that being an African American woman posed any impediments particular or even peculiar to your pursuit of writing about black music?

YES.  Well first, for reasons beyond my comprehension, women are typically not expected to know much about music, especially not jazz.  It’s akin to a woman knowing a lot about sports (which I love as well); you’re treading on male-dominated territory.  You’re often treated like an interloper.  I’m speaking in generalizations of course, but those kinds of attitudes do exist.  So it becomes a question of your credibility.  It arises when trying to get interviews with musicians on the front end and trying to get publicity for your work in major music journals on the back end.  In the case of Hazel Scott, it was almost comical because at first editors would ask: Hazel Scott?  Who is SHE?”  Then they’d look at me and say: “Who are YOU?”

While researching the Hazel Scott biography and simultaneously looking for a publisher — which took nearly five years, one editor — a woman — at a very prestigious house seriously questioned my ability to write about the subject.  She suggested that somehow because I was a Black woman, I wasn’t capable of writing about another Black woman.  Absurd, I know.  So what do you do?  Say exactly what’s on your mind and burn that bridge down to a crisp right then and there, or smile politely and leave?  I left.  When my then agent (who was Jewish) and I walked out of the building, I turned to her and said bluntly: “If you and I had switched places and YOU were the author and I was your agent, we might have had a better chance at a deal.”

I am of the opinion that American publishers are exceedingly comfortable with books about African Americans — our culture, our art, our music, our history — being written by non-Black writers.  It’s as if the Black American experience is open to any and all purveyors; everyone gets to have their say about us, unless it is US… well, then watch out!  I can’t think of another group of people in this country whose culture has been co-opted with such regularity; we are constantly being dissected, examined, explained…  It’s so commonplace that being a Black writer documenting the experience of your own people is almost exotic, something new, requiring a different set of rules, a new set of expectations.  To complicate matters further, bias exists within our community as well.  On the flipside, an African American editor — a woman — responded to my [Hazel Scott] book proposal by saying: “This would be a great book IF it was written by someone else.”  Someone else like who?!  So I’ve caught it from both ends.  It’s all very curious.  Now, judging from the number of books being published today by Black writers what I am saying may sound ridiculous to some, but I’m not talking about the final outcome, the ultimate output (or the quality of the output), but about the sheer madness that many Black authors encounter on their quest to find a publisher.  It’s the part of the story that no one gets to read.

Ms. Chilton did indeed persevere and realize her Hazel Scott bio

In writing books on Gloria Lynne and Hazel Scott, did the fact of who you are pose any particular challenges in your quests at getting at the essence of these two great and underappreciated artists?

Fortunately, I felt very much at home writing both books.  By virtue of my own life experience and my being a performer, I intrinsically understood the demands and challenges of their careers.  However, as a biographer, you’re obsessed with the idea of “getting it right.”  It can be an overwhelming thing holding someone’s ‘life’ in your hands as it were, and crafting a narrative that is a truthful reflection.  With Gloria Lynne, of course, I had her there with me if I ever needed more clarity.  It was just a matter of picking up the phone.  With Hazel Scott, it was much more daunting.  There were so few people around to talk to who knew her intimately.  Her running buddies were Dizzy Gillespie and his wife Lorraine, Duke Ellington, Billie Holiday, Lester Young, Mary Lou Williams, Lena Horne…  Luckily, her son Adam Powell lll, was extremely generous, sharing his mother’s memorabilia with me, including her personal journal writings which were the beginnings of the memoir she was working on before her death in 1981.  I also had the pleasure of interviewing people like Mike Wallace (CBS 60 Minutes) who was a lifelong friend of Hazel and her ex-husband Adam Clayton Powell, Jr.; jazz pianist Marian McPartland, Matthew Kennedy (former director of the Fisk Jubilee Singers), Murray Horwitz (co-creator of Ain’t Misbehavin’) among others.

Still, getting interviews and/or gaining the trust of interviewees was probably my most challenging and time-consuming task.  Because I am not affiliated with an academic institution or a major newspaper or magazine, my requests for interviews were declined often, if not ignored completely.  I had to do some extra talking/convincing/cajoling in order to gain access to information.  I certainly couldn’t say I’m an actor who happens to write jazz biographies on the side (I made that mistake once and I’m still waiting for that musician to return my call!).  It was one of my greatest disappointments with the project.  I felt that Hazel Scott deserved better.  If they couldn’t submit to even a 5 or 10 minute conversation for my benefit, surely they could have done it for her.

Why do you suppose the efforts of Black writers chronicling jazz and jazz artists is different from the similar pursuits of others?

I wish I had a coherent answer to this question; something that actually made some sense.  I have several theories, some that I’ve tossed around with other Black writers who write about jazz, but I’ve yet to come to a conclusion that I can feel good about.  Is there a general fear or distrust of writers, a concern of being misrepresented, misquoted, misunderstood?  Of course there are some truly great Black writers who continue to do great work on the subject.  That does not discount the fact, however, that the gathering of research which includes interviews with prominent jazz artists, is not a constant challenge to obtain.  Even among writers, there can be a reluctance to share information.  I don’t know the answer, I wish I did.  The only thing I know for sure is that being Black and being a woman and writing about jazz can cause some real upset.

Any closing thoughts?

It’s an amazing thing being a writer — a gift, a joy, and a blessing.  Spending time documenting the music and the artists that you admire ain’t nothing but love.  And in the end, it’s all about love, isn’t it?  It’s the thing that enables us to bear the brunt of ignorance, arrogance, envy, and apathy that often come with the territory.  Jazz remains the greatest music in the land.  Because the contributions of many of its artists are so gravely overlooked and under-documented it makes completing a work on one of its legends always feel like a victory.  And even if your book lands on the dusty bottom of a bookstore shelf, off in the corner in the back next to the outermost window under the single column dedicated to “Music,” you can always count on that precious handful of people who will seek it out, find it, and love it.  And for them, and for the children, and for the ancestors, we go forth…

Karen Chilton with Randy Weston and The Independent Ear at our MoCADA book signing in Brooklyn for African Rhythms.

Posted in General Discussion | 1 Comment

Jazz Radio Commentaries: Rusty Hassan pt. 2

Rusty Hassan has a kind of mystery about his look in this photo, but though he is indeed a nuanced gentleman, there seems little mystery about this thoughtful, even-tempered man-about-jazz; he remains one of DC’s go-to guys when it comes to the history of the music and his weekly program on WPFW is a pillar of that station’s programming.  In part two of our virtual conversation Rusty discusses the nuts & bolts of how he assembles his programs.

Programming my show involves selecting a mix of new releases, CDs by artists coming to town, and classic recordings by earlier jazz artists.  I have a black leather backpack that I rotate in recordings as artists come in & out of DC and new and reissue recordings become available.  (As I get older. it becomes more and more tempting to use a slip case as [others] do, but I’m slow to change.)  I will often feature an artist on or around his or her birthday and will certainly mark the passing of a musician.  The recent death of Marion Brown had me searching for the Lps that I brought back from Europe in 1969.  I will have selected some of the music prior to the show but even those selections may change once I get to the studio and do my show.

Saxophonist Marion Brown’s recent passing sent Rusty back to the archives

     I program sets of music mixing the new music with classic jazz.  There is a lot of improvisation in my programming and I like having a lot of music to select from, thus the backpack of CDs.  For better or worse I was a pioneer in playing [consecutive] different versions of a song, frequently mixing in a vocal with an instrumental.  I still may do that in a set, but not as often as I used to.  I almost always include “A Word from Bird” because when I discovered Charlie Parker’s music as a young teenager I found out I was born on the day he recorded “Now’s The Time” andd “Koko,” and I took that as my Zodiac sign.  Unless the recording is by a big band I will announce the musicians on a date.  If identified, soloists from large ensembles will get a nod.  Jazz is primarily a soloist’s art form and [The Independent Ear’s] recent post about the lack of information about musicians on recently released recordings raises issues that are important for the artists on the dates.

     Years ago I had a conversation with the late Felix Grant [one of DC’s hallowed, classic jazz radio voices] about programming jazz on the radio.  We had both come to WDCU at the same time.  He had been on commercial radio for over forty years while I had been on non-commercial public stations for two decades.  He said that he was reveling in the freedom he had in playing cuts that lasted overe six or seven minutes.  He programmed his show, however, the way he had for years on WMAL, using a stop watch and scripting commentary in advance.  I continued to play sets that featured performances lasting twice as long and programmed while doing the show [the art of radio programming improvisation].  We both agreed that it was important to impart information about the musicians and to feature artists that were coming into town.

   The recent posts by Arturo Gomez, Jim Szabo, and Miyuki Williams in this series demonstrate that there is a continuity in jazz radio programming that goes back to what Felix Grant was doing in the 1950s and 60s, and indeed back to what Symphony Sid was doing in the 1940s.  The programmers present new music by artists who need to have their recordings heard by a general audience and to let that audience know that these artists are performing in their communities. 

     Craig Taylor in his comments [in response to previous posts in this jazz radio programmers series] raises interesting and important issues about the state of jazz radio in a changed media and technological environment, but he fails to see the answers to the questions he raised contained within the comments of Gomez, Szabo and Williams.  They all stress the connection to their local communities that are important for the musicians that are performing in those communities.  Sirius XM features great jazz but won’t feature the jazz artist performing at Blues Alley or Twins Jazz this week.  I love listening to my iPod while riding my bicycle; the shuffle or genius function does an incredible job selecting music from the thousands of tunes available, but it won’t let me know who is the tenor soloist on “I’ll Remember April”, nor will it introduce me to something new that I don’t download myself.  And it certainly won’t let me know that Mulgrew Miller is playing with Anat Cohen at the Kennedy Center.  The internet has made music easily available for those seeking it out.  Good jazz radio programmers let their audiences know what to seek out.

     Jazz radio has certainly been hit hard in the 21st century.  There are far fewer stations broadcasting jazz but those that continue to do so play an important function in the survival of the music as a viable art form.  Musicians in New York depend on WBGO to inform listeners about gigs while listeners in Denver will hear their new recordings on KUVO.  I still learn new things about the music from Bobby Hill on WPFW or old things from Rob Bamberger on WAMU.  Arturo Gomez put it very well when he said jazz radio is alive and striving.  Jazz radio is important and relevant because it connects musicians and their music to local communities while reaching a different and potentially world wide audience through internet streaming and podcasts.  The economics of doing so on public, listener supported stations make it difficult but not impossible, still important and not irrelevant.  I am proud to have done my small part in letting listeners in Washington, DC hear the music of artists deserving to be heard and will continue to do so as long as jazz radio is “alive and striving.”

Posted in General Discussion | 1 Comment

Yusef Lateef @ 90

Some years ago the Jazz Journalists Association, as a tribute to friend and colleague the late Harlem jazz writer Clarence Atkins sponsored a group of aspiring African American music writers to attend a journalism conference in California.  I’m happy to say that for the most part they have continued to write particularly on jazz, and in fact two of them — Bridget Arnwine and Rahsaan Clark Morris — contributed to The Independent Ear’s ongoing African American writers’ series (continued with Karen Chilton in this current installment) “Ain’t But a Few Of Us.”  I caught up with Rahsaan at a book signing Randy Weston and I did for our book African Rhythms at Columbia College in Chicago earlier this month (also attended by another of the Clarence Atkins Fellows, jazz broadcaster Michelle Drayton).  

At the time Rahsaan was raving about a brilliant performance he had recently witnessed by NEA Jazz Master Yusef Lateef and his longtime partner, percussionist Adam Rudolph, October 22 in San Francisco.  Here’s what Rahsaan subsequently wrote about that performance, which was particularly significant because it came only a couple of weeks after Lateef observed his milestone 90th birthday.  You gotta admit, blowing saxophones and flutes in a Yusefian manner in one’s 9th decade is quite notable.

Getting to the Other Side    

During one of the impromptu songs that ninety year old Yusef Lateef performed at Grace Cathedral in San Francisco on a Friday night in late October, he began to sing about “Crossing the river and getting to the other side,” and “taking my brothers andd sisters with me.”  Harkening back to spirituals in the confinees of one of America’s great churches — this was where Duke Ellington first premiered his Sacred Music concert — lent an air of hopefulness to an already entertaining set.  With the aid of percussionist Adam Rudolph, Lateef, who performed mostly on tenor saxophone, musette and flute, used the spaciousness and the famous seven-second delay of the Cathedral to the best advantage I’ve heard at these so-called Sacred Space concerts over the years.

     With improvised music totally constructed from horn sounds, beats from conga and djembe, chants and vocals, tones and elongated notes that reverberated off the Cathedral’s vaulted ceilings, this music was perfect for the place and the place ended up being perfect for the music.  One reason why this worked so well this time and maybe not so well for others in this place is because both of these musicians know how to play in — and with — space.  Listening to Adam Rudolph’s measured hits on gong and his nearly silent patient tones on xylophone reminded me of his contributions to the quiet songs of Mandingo Griot Society, with Hamid Drake and Foday Musa Susso back in the ’80s.

     Lateef was one of the first, if not the first, jazz musician to use Eastern instruments in his music.  So to hear this concert was to return to the mode of tunes like “Three Faces of Bilal” from his 1961 Prestige release Eastern Sounds, or “Chandra” from The Diverse Yusef Lateef; quiet, contemplative, nearly meditative music meant to soothe and heal.  Lateef and Rudolph used the space in between sounds to aid the composition, timing, and to let the reverberation fill in where they felt it would work best.  And then Yusef sang, his voice surprisingly resilient for his age.  Still wearing a kufi and traditional African garb, Lateef is still, to this day, true to his life’s intentions and not just artistic intentions.  Then again, to the true artist, those intentions are one and the same. 

— Rahsaan Clark Morris 10/22/10

Posted in General Discussion | 2 Comments